Neil Kumar is a Republican candidate for U.S. Congress, representing Arkansas’s Third District. He is a member of the Sons of Confederate Veterans and Sons of the American Revolution, with blood that has been Southern since the 17th century. Kumar, who is a graduate of the University of Chicago and a native Arkansan, has written for numerous publications, including the Abbeville Institute, American Renaissance, Identity Dixie, The Political Cesspool, Clyde Wilson’s Reckonin‘, and VDare.
Kumar and I talk about his ancestry, his “rightist” political awakening, and his Christian conversion, how whites have racially disarmed themselves, how the power-hungry left has pathologized whiteness, how too many Southerners are on the defensive (instead of on the offensive and rightfully taking command of the moral high ground), and how his bold congressional platform aims to remedy these very deep and dangerous problems.
With a degree in anthropology and now knee-deep in law school, one wouldn’t think that such a young man could be so common-sense and so wise. But Kumar is and his writing proves it.
Here are some of my favorites:
• “Reconstruction in Arkansas“
• “All that is ugly, broken, and foul“
• “An open letter to Walmart“
• “White open spaces“
• “John Brown’s body: A review of ‘The Secret Six’ by Otto Scott“
• “You reap what you sow“
Also mentioned in our conversation are my interview with Lauren Witzke and the progressive and predictable hack job inventing an SCV “leak” along with its gaslit “aggressive neo-Confederates” narrative. I say, damn straight we’re aggressive!
So, on this 158th anniversary of Pickett’s Charge (the final day of the Battle of Gettysburg, which waged from July 1-3, 1863), let’s consider Kumar’s message and his candidacy as a much-needed frontal assault against the undeniable Southern genocide, the pathologization of whiteness, the destruction of the family, and the mass proliferation of godlessness and globohomo. “Come on, boys! Give them the cold steel!”
Download this episode, watch our discussion on Odysee, or listen here. 👇
Comments
Another great podcast. It’s great that he has grabbed onto his mother’s side with its rich history. I do believe however that we should not date outside of our race though no fault of his own. Years past I would say that some one could date whoever ever they wanted but with the white race being attacked left and right and so much interracial mixing I no longer think this way. It’s time for white marriages and white babies.
His politics are exactly what we are needing in today’s government. I do think that he would be able to make more changes at the local level. We need to move away from this thinking that the federal government is all powerful. Well here I am rambling now. I’ll just say great podcast as usual and look forward to who you have on next. I also need to think of a name for myself as I heard Musonius Rufus talk about on one of his podcast especially since my last doxxing event. Anyway great listen.
Author
I appreciate the comment, Michael. Yes, his thoughts on interracial confusion are quite interesting. I too know way more about my British Isle and Virginia and North Carolina roots than I do my Lebanese ancestry. That’s who I am, even though my genetic makeup is part-Middle Eastern. Southernness is my identity and I am thankful for that, although I would love to learn more about the Lebanese stuff, not just for the familial factor, but also for the historical and religious perspective. I find genealogy so fascinating!
As far as dating outside of one’s race goes, I would say that I would also suggest this for my sons because marriage is hard enough without throwing a lot of other trials in the mix from the get-go, just as I would suggest to them getting married to someone who is Orthodox, and is Southern, comes from a 2-parent home, and hasn’t been road hard and put up wet.
However, if that person happened to be a white feminist, I would also urge them to not go down that path. And Yankee grrrls: well, that’d be a no go for sure! The point to me is finding a wife that overwhelmingly shares your belief system and worldview. That’s just a good foundation for a sturdy marriage that can weather the storms. And I wouldn’t urge them not to marry a based black woman, but I would caution them that it would be hard on the marriage and the kids, and that you’d have to be extremely careful to make sure the children don’t feel identity-less or rootless – that they need to understand the heritage from whence they came and the one they should carry on.
But you’re right, with the war on white folks (a genocide, as Kumar describes), more white babies is definitely something that needs to happen. I wish I had had more than three kids, but alas, I was a retarded leftist who didn’t get married till she was 29 and have children till 36. What a fool I was! But I want my sons to learn from my mistakes. Rule #1: Get married young and have a brood of babes (an entire bluegrass band, as my husband would say). And rule #2: Don’t marry a feminist, a socialist, an atheist, or a Yankee, and you’re probably gonna land a white chick by default. 😉
Pingback: Our Man in Arkansas | Counter-Currents